INQUIRER PHOTO / NINO JESUS ORBETA
The Sandiganbayan has dismissed the charges against three alleged dummies of the late former President Ferdinand Marcos Sr. in one of the last remaining civil cases against the deposed leader involving the alleged accumulation of P2.4 billion worth of properties believed to be ill-gotten wealth.
In an 18-page resolution dated Feb. 23, the Sandiganbayan鈥檚 Fourth Division granted the demurrers to evidence filed separately by three of the defendants in Civil Case No. 0010鈥擮lympio Bermudez, the heirs of Geronimo Velasco and the joint administrators of the estate of Emilio Yap.
The Presidential Commission on Good Government (PCGG) had accused Marcos, former first lady Imelda Marcos and her brother Alfredo 鈥淏ejo鈥� Romualdez of being in 鈥渁ctive collaboration鈥� to acquire 95 percent of the Bataan Shipyard and Engineering Co., Inc. (Baseco).
The PCGG also alleged that they acquired a 鈥渕ajority share鈥� of Manila International Ports Terminal Inc. (MIPTI), majority shares of Philippine Dockyard Corp., and 80 percent of the Philippine Jai-Alai and Amusement Corp. (PJAC), through their alleged dummies, including Bermudez, Velasco and Yap.
According to the antigraft court, the prosecution failed to prove its allegations against the three in the amended complaint for the case, noting that only two witnesses were presented against them.
It pointed out that the witnesses, Maria Lourdes Magno and Antonio Rolando Eduarte, were 鈥渕ere custodians鈥� in the PCGG and Baseco, respectively.
The plaintiff in the case, or the Philippine government, also failed to comply with the original document rule by submitting exhibits that were 鈥渕ere photocopies,鈥� the court said.
It added that Magno and Eduarte, as witnesses, had 鈥渘o personal knowledge鈥� of the contents, preparation, execution and issuance of the documents.
鈥淐learly, their testimonies are insufficient to prove the charges in the amended complaint,鈥� read the resolution penned by Associate Justice Michael Frederick Musngi, the Fourth Division鈥檚 chair.
鈥淭he other documents admitted by the court likewise cannot be given probative value for failure to prove the charges against defendants Yap, Bermudez and Velasco,鈥� it said.
Among the documents presented as evidence were the deeds of transfer; inventory of Baseco titles and contracts; and a certification by the Batangas provincial assessor dated April 27, 1987; among others.
Insufficient evidence
The prosecution was aiming, through the pieces of evidence, to prove that Romualdez was the 鈥渢rue and beneficial owner鈥� of Baseco, that Marcos approved the transfer of certain parcels of land of the Export Processing Zone Authority in Mariveles, Bataan, to Baseco, and that Baseco, MIPTI and PJAC were 鈥渙perating companies鈥� of Romualdez and the Marcos couple.
鈥淣one of these exhibits prove the actual participation of defendants Bermudez, Velasco and Yap in the alleged acquisition of defendant Romualdez of a majority share in Baseco, MIPTI, PJAC and PDC,鈥� the Sandiganbayan ruled.
It also stressed that the government was 鈥渦nable鈥� to show how the three had acted as dummies for Romualdez and the Marcos couple.
READ: Sandiganbayan junks another ill-gotten wealth case vs. Marcoses
鈥淭he plaintiff simply stated in its comments that the defendants exerted significant influence and control within the corporations and had access to internal documents and transactions, making it highly improbable that they did not act as nominee, dummy or agents of defendants Romualdez and spouses Marcos,鈥� the court explained, adding:
鈥淭his assumption, however, has to be backed by competent evidentiary substantiation.鈥�
The Sandiganbayan鈥檚 Feb. 23 resolution was concurred in by Associate Justices Lorifel Lacap Pahimna and Maria Theresa Mendoza-Arcega. INQ